Site icon Ganga Time

Israel’s Strike and the Fallout: A 4-Day Chronicle of the Iran Israel Conflict

file_000000007bb861f..._imresizer

The Iran Israel conflict took a devastating turn in June 2025. What began as rising tensions escalated into a four-day military confrontation, leaving hundreds dead, thousands displaced, and the world on edge. This blog presents a detailed overview of how the events unfolded and why many view Israel as the responsible initiator.


On June 12, 2025, a wave of coordinated airstrikes was launched by Israel on multiple Iranian targets. Nuclear facilities in Natanz, Fordow, and Esfahan were hit. These attacks were not announced beforehand, and no international consensus was sought. Israeli officials claimed that the strikes were a “preemptive defense” to halt Iran’s nuclear advancement.

However, the global community was taken by surprise. Iran’s infrastructure, including military and civilian sectors, suffered immense damage. At least 224 Iranians, including nuclear scientists and civilian workers, were killed on the first day. Hospitals across Tehran were overwhelmed.

It is worth noting that no immediate military action had been taken by Iran prior to these strikes, and the Iran Israel conflict was essentially initiated through Israeli military aggression.


By June 13, Iran’s Supreme Leader declared that “Iran reserves the right to self-defense under international law.” In retaliation, Iran launched dozens of drones and over 100 ballistic missiles toward Israeli cities including Tel Aviv, Haifa, and Beersheba.

Israel’s Iron Dome and U.S.-provided missile defense systems managed to intercept the majority of incoming missiles, but several broke through. Civilian areas were hit, causing 14 deaths and injuring more than 200. One of the missiles struck a school compound in Ramat Gan, where children had to be evacuated under emergency protocols.

Meanwhile, the Iran Israel conflict intensified as Iran made it clear that any further aggression would lead to escalated responses.


On June 14, both nations experienced more bloodshed. Israeli forces continued their airstrikes deep inside Iranian territory. Cities like Shiraz, Yazd, and Tehran witnessed night bombings. Explosions rocked civilian neighborhoods as Iranian media showed footage of collapsed apartment buildings and destroyed roads.

Over 120 more Iranian lives were lost—many of them non-combatants, including women and children. Rescue operations were carried out under the rubble for hours, often interrupted by renewed aerial alerts.

Simultaneously, Iran launched a second wave of drone attacks. While most drones were intercepted, a few reached southern Israeli towns. Six Israeli civilians were confirmed dead on this day. The fear of further retaliation left cities on both sides in lockdown.

The Iran Israel conflict, once confined to threats and proxy wars, had now become a full-scale, direct war—fought at the cost of innocent lives.


On June 15, the fourth day, international pressure mounted. The United Nations called an emergency session. The EU, Russia, Turkey, and even China urged both countries to retreat and negotiate peace. The U.S. stated that it had not authorized the Israeli strikes but acknowledged aiding in missile defense.

Meanwhile, 100 more Iranian missiles were fired, this time targeting Israeli defense bases. A few hit near the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv. Though damage was limited, the symbolic implications were heavy. Four Israeli soldiers and three civilians were reported killed.

Israel responded with one final wave of strikes targeting Iran’s South Pars gas facilities and suspected weapons depots in Esfahan. Iran claimed those sites were civilian-owned.

By the end of Day 4, more than 370 Iranians and 24 Israelis (including both military personnel and civilians) had died. Thousands on both sides were injured, displaced, and psychologically traumatized.

The Iran Israel conflict had not only destabilized the region but also awakened the world to the dangers of unilateral military action.


Blame, in such sensitive matters, must be approached carefully. However, by factual timelines, it is clear that Israel launched the first strike without international approval. While Israel cited “national security,” no verified evidence had been presented at the time to suggest Iran was preparing for an imminent nuclear strike.

Iran’s retaliation was framed as a legal response under Article 51 of the UN Charter, which allows for self-defense when attacked. Iran’s actions followed Israel’s offensive, not the other way around.

Even long-time allies like the European Union expressed “grave concern” over Israel’s decision to act independently and without consulting international bodies.


Regardless of who is blamed, the greatest tragedy remains the loss of civilian life.

In Iran:

In Israel:

This Iran Israel conflict exposed how quickly tensions can spiral into chaos, and how civilians always pay the ultimate price.


The situation remains tense. While indirect talks are rumored to be occurring via Turkey and Oman, no formal ceasefire has been declared.

If Iran exits the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)—a move it is now considering—the global nuclear landscape could shift dramatically. Meanwhile, Israel has shown no intention of scaling down defense measures.

Both nations stand at a crossroads. The world watches closely.


The Iran Israel conflict that erupted in June 2025 was sparked by Israel’s aggressive military campaign against Iranian sites. While Israel claims its actions were preventative, the cost of that decision has been severe—on both sides.

Innocent civilians have suffered, regional stability has been shaken, and global peace has been threatened.

True security cannot be achieved through bombs and missiles. Only diplomacy, mutual respect, and international cooperation can prevent further bloodshed. The path forward must prioritize humanity over hostility.


Exit mobile version